Genetic Diversity of Infectious
Laryngotracheitis Virus during In Vivo
Coinfection Parallels Viral Replication
and Arises from Recombination Hot
Spots within the Genome
Carlos
A. Loncoman,a Carol A. Hartley,a Mauricio J. C. Coppo,a Paola K. Vaz,a
Andrés Diaz-Méndez,a Glenn F. Browning,a Maricarmen García,b Stephen Spatz,c
Joanne M. Devlina
Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural
Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaa
; Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center,
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USAb; Southeast Poultry Research
Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Athens, Georgia, USAc
ABSTRACT Recombination is a feature of many alphaherpesviruses that infect people
and animals. Infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV; Gallid alphaherpesvirus 1) causes
respiratory disease in chickens, resulting in significant production losses in poultry industries
worldwide. Natural (field) ILTV recombination is widespread, particularly recombination
between attenuated ILTV vaccine strains to create virulent viruses. These virulent recombinants
have had a major impact on animal health. Recently, the development of a
single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assay for ILTV has helped to understand
ILTV recombination in laboratory settings. In this study, we applied this SNP genotyping
assay to further examine ILTV recombination in the natural host. Following coinoculation
of specific-pathogen-free chickens, we examined the resultant progeny for
evidence of viral recombination and characterized the diversity of the recombinants over
time. The results showed that ILTV replication and recombination are closely related and
that the recombinant viral progeny are most diverse 4 days after coinoculation, which is
the peak of viral replication. Further, the locations of recombination breakpoints in a selection
of the recombinant progeny, and in field isolates of ILTV from different geographical
regions, were examined following full-genome sequencing and used to identify
recombination hot spots in the ILTV genome.
IMPORTANCE Alphaherpesviruses are common causes of disease in people and animals.
Recombination enables genome diversification in many different species of alphaherpesviruses,
which can lead to the evolution of higher levels of viral virulence.
Using the alphaherpesvirus infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV), we performed
coinfections in the natural host (chickens) to demonstrate high levels of virus recombination.
Higher levels of diversity in the recombinant progeny coincided with the
highest levels of virus replication. In the recombinant progeny, and in field isolates,
recombination occurred at greater frequency in recombination hot spot regions of
the virus genome. Our results suggest that control measures that aim to limit viral
replication could offer the potential to limit virus recombination and thus the evolution
of virulence. The development and use of vaccines that are focused on limiting
virus replication, rather than vaccines that are focused more on limiting clinical disease,
may be indicated in order to better control disease.
KEYWORDS herpesvirus, recombination, replication, diversity, SNP genotyping assay,
vaccine, infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV), recombination hot spot, gallid
herpesvirus 1, ILTV
Received 12 July 2017 Accepted 12
September 2017
Accepted manuscript posted online 22
September 2017
Citation Loncoman, CA, Hartley CA, Coppo
MJC, Vaz PK, Diaz-Méndez A, Browning GF,
García M, Spatz S, Devlin JM. 2017. Genetic
diversity of infectious laryngotracheitis virus
during in vivo coinfection parallels viral
replication and arises from recombination hot
spots within the genome. Appl Environ
Microbiol 83:e01532-17. https://doi.org/10
.1128/AEM.01532-17.
Editor Harold L. Drake, University of Bayreuth
Copyright © 2017 American Society for
Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Address correspondence to Carlos A. Loncoman,
cloncoman@student.unimelb.edu.au.
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
crossm
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 Applied and Environmental Microbiology aem.asm.org 1
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/
Downloaded from
I
nfectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV; Gallid alphaherpesvirus 1) is an alphaherpesvirus
that causes mild to severe respiratory disease in chickens. The virus causes major
economic losses due to mortality and decreases in weight gain and egg production in
poultry industries worldwide (1). Recombination between different strains of ILTV has
been recognized as a problem for the poultry industry, particularly because natural
recombination between attenuated vaccine strains of ILTV has been shown to generate
virulent viruses (2). The importance of recombination as a mechanism of viral genome
diversification and evolution in ILTV and other alphaherpesviruses is increasingly being
recognized (3). Viruses can acquire genetic changes through several mechanisms,
including point mutation and recombination, with the latter particularly important
in many alphaherpesviruses (4–6). Viruses that belong to the order Herpesvirales
have double-stranded linear DNA genomes and have complex viral DNA replication
machinery, comprising a DNA polymerase with a highly efficient proofreading capacity,
resulting in very low rates of spontaneous mutation (7–9). Therefore, rather than
random changes or point mutations throughout the genome, recombination is considered
to be a major evolutionary driving force enabling many alphaherpesviruses to
persist, evolve and eventually become more virulent over time (2, 10, 11).
Four types of recombination have been described, based on the structure of the
crossover site: site-specific recombination, transposition recombination, nonhomologous
or illegitimate recombination, and homologous recombination (12). Homologous
and illegitimate recombination, specifically intraspecific recombination, are the most
commonly described recombination mechanisms in alphaherpesviruses (12). Intraspecific
recombination under in vitro conditions has been extensively described for several
alphaherpesvirus species, including Human alphaherpesvirus 1, also known as herpes
simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) (13), Bovine alphaherpesvirus 1, also known as bovine herpesvirus
1 (BoHV-1) (14), Human alphaherpesvirus 3, also known as varicella-zoster virus
(VZV) (15), Felid alphaherpesvirus 1, also known as felid herpesvirus 1 (FeHV-1) (16) and
Suid alphaherpesvirus 1, also known as pseudorabies virus (PRV) (17). Full-genome
sequencing and sequence analysis are the most suitable methods for detecting and
describing alphaherpesvirus recombination events that occur under natural (field)
conditions, but even nowadays these techniques have their limitations, including
intensive labor and costs. In contrast, under experimental conditions, other techniques
to detect recombination are still more efficient and cost-effective, as well as more
suitable for testing large numbers of viruses (14, 18).
We have recently described the development and validation of a TaqMan single
nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assay to study recombination under experimental
conditions in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens (18), the natural host of
ILTV. Use of the natural host to study recombination may reveal aspects of herpesvirus
biology that may not be apparent in studies that utilize laboratory animal models of
infection (19). The aim of this study was to apply this ILTV SNP genotyping assay to
examine in vivo recombination between two ILTV strains over time. This was performed
in order to describe recombination patterns and to examine genetic diversity among
the viral progeny during the course of an ILTV infection. Additionally, we aimed to
identify any recombination hot spots in the ILTV genome by performing full-genome
sequencing of selected recombinants and analyzing them along with other ILTV
genomes that were already available from different geographical regions, including
Asia, Australia, Europe, and the United States.
RESULTS
Bird survival rates and virus genome quantification. Groups of chickens were
coinoculated with the V1-99 and CSW-1 strains of ILTV at two different doses or were
inoculated with only either V1-99 or CSW-1. The survival rates in groups of birds that
were inoculated only with low or high doses of V1-99 ILTV were around 70% and 45%
throughout the experiment, respectively (Fig. 1). Groups that received only CSW-1 had
100% survival rates throughout the experiment (Fig. 1). In the coinoculated groups, the
Loncoman et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 2
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
FIG 2 Replication of ILTV in SPF chickens based on genome copy numbers in tracheal swabs measured using
qPCR. Medians are indicated by lines for each group. Birds were inoculated with either CSW-1 or V1-99 or
coinoculated (co-inoc) with 103 PFU (low dose) (A to D) or with 104 PFU (high dose) (E to H) of the V1-99 and
(Continued on next page)
Loncoman et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 4
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
lated with the low dose of viruses, 14, 26, 15, and 9 genotype patterns were detected
at 2, 4, 6, and 8 days postinoculation, respectively (Tables 2 and 3). Some of these
genotype patterns were detected consistently over time in both low- and high-doseinoculated
groups. In the singly inoculated groups, no recombination was detected
within the 10 viruses that were isolated and purified from each infected chicken at day
4 from the groups inoculated with the higher viral dose of 1 104 PFU/ml (see Fig. S1
in the supplemental material).
Viral-diversity analysis. The higher level of viral replication in the low-dosecoinoculated
group at day 4 than day 2 (Fig. 2A and B) coincided with a higher level
of viral diversity, as assessed using Renyi diversity profiles (Fig. 5A) and as indicated
by significantly higher values for diversity as measured by richness (0), ShannonWeaver
(1), 1/Simpson (2), 1/Berger Parker (infinite [Inf]), and Hill (0.25, 0.5, 4, 8, 16, 32,
and 64) scales, as well as evenness values at these time points (see Table S1 in the
supplemental material). The Renyi diversity profile was higher at day 6 than at day 8
(Fig. 5B); however, the diversity measurements were not significantly different between
these days (see Table S2). In the high-dose-coinoculated group, the Renyi diversity
profile was higher at day 4 than at day 2 (Fig. 5C), coinciding with the higher levels of
viral replication at day 4 than day 2 in this group (Fig. 2E and F). Significant differences
were detected only in the Shannon-Weaver (1), 1/Simpson (2), and Hill (4) values for
these days (see Table S3).
Full-genome sequencing and identification of recombination hot spots. Six
progeny viruses were selected for full-genome sequencing and analysis (see Table S4)
in order to identify all recombination events and compare these to those detected with
the SNP genotyping assay and to examine the distribution of recombination breakpoints
along the genome. These recombination patterns were also searched for among
35 other full ILTV genome sequences of isolates from Asia, Australia, Europe, and
the United States in order to identify recombination hot spots in ILTV from distinct
geographical regions. In addition to the distribution of recombination breakpoints
detected by RDP4, reticulate network and phi test analyses were performed as previously
described (20) (see Fig. S2).
The six SNPs targeted by the TaqMan SNP genotyping assay were confirmed by
full-genome analysis. Additional events were detected outside the genome regions
targeted by the TaqMan assay. The full genomes of the two genotype pattern 9 viruses
shared 99.9% pairwise sequence identity. Between these two genotype pattern 9
viruses, 11 SNPs were detected within genes UL[ 1], US5, US6, US7, US8, and US9,
located between bp 110000 and bp 140000 in the aligned sequences. Two SNPs were
identified in the protein IF and UL49 genes located between bp 8000 to bp 18000 in
the aligned sequences, and two SNPs were identified in the UL43 and UL17 genes
between bp 74000 and bp 86000. When CSW-1 was used as the reference strain, a total
of 55 polymorphisms were found in the six viruses sequenced in this study (see Table
S5 in the supplemental material).
A high number of recombination breakpoints were identified in two locations
extending from bp 20000 to bp 50000 and from bp 106000 to bp 137000 in the six
genome sequences from viruses isolated in this study (Fig. 6B). When the full-genome
sequences from other ILTV isolates from varied geographical regions were examined,
the recombination hot spots detected in those genomes were consistent with those
found in the six genomes sequenced from the in vivo study (Fig. 6C, D, and E).
Recombination events within genes UL[ 1] and ICP4 were detected in ILTV sequences
FIG 2 Legend (Continued)
CSW-1 strains of ILTV. (A and B) Low-dose-coinoculated birds F, G, H, I, and J (in the circles) had higher numbers
of viral genome copies at day 4 than at day 2 (P 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). These birds did not survive to day
6. (C and D) Low-dose-coinoculated birds K, L, and M (in the rectangles) did not have significantly different
numbers of viral genome copies between day 6 and day 8 (P 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). (E and F) High-dosecoinoculated
birds A, B, C, D, and E (in the triangles) had higher numbers of viral genome copies at day 4
than at day 2 (P 0.05, Mann-Whitney test). (G and H) High-dose-coinoculated birds did not survive to days
6 and 8.
ILTV Recombination in the Natural Host Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 5
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
FIG 3 Recombination patterns, as determined using SNP genotyping, in progeny viruses isolated 2 and
4 days after coinoculation of SPF chickens with 104 PFU of each of CSW-1 and V1-99 ILTV. Each row
corresponds to a virus isolate, with the CSW-1 SNPs indicated by gray boxes and the V1-99 SNPs by black
boxes. Each distinct recombination pattern was given a unique genotype code (final column).
Loncoman et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 6
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
from Australia and the United States and in our in vivo recombinants (Table 4).
Recombination events among the Asian ILTV strains were detected at sites similar to
those detected in the Australian strains, with recombination breakpoints found in
genes UL4, UL3.5, UL28, UL29, UL30, UL31, UL32, UL33, and UL34 (Table 4). Only one
recombination breakpoint was detected and confirmed by several methods in the ILTV
sequences from Europe (Italy) (Table 4). Hence, because of the low number of recombination
events in the European group, no recombination hot spots were detected.
DISCUSSION
Our results show that higher levels of diversity in the recombinant progeny occurred
at the same time as higher levels of virus replication (as measured by viral titers). A
direct relationship between viral replication and recombination diversity would have
important implications for disease control, as it suggests that measures taken to reduce
viral replication, such as administration of vaccines to limit virus replication following
challenge (21), may be able to reduce the diversity of recombinant viruses, thus potentially
reducing the capacity of ILTV to evolve to higher levels of virulence. Vaccines are used
FIG 4 Recombination patterns, as determined using SNP genotyping, in progeny viruses isolated 2, 4, 6, and 8 days after coinoculation of SPF chickens with
103 PFU of each of CSW-1 and V1-99. Each row corresponds to a virus isolate, with the CSW-1 SNPs indicated by gray boxes and the V1-99 SNPs by black boxes.
Each distinct recombination pattern was given a unique genotype code (final column).
ILTV Recombination in the Natural Host Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 7
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
regularly in poultry industries to control ILT. As previously described, most vaccines
reduce, but do not prevent, ILTV replication (as measured by viral titers) after challenge,
due to cell-mediated immune responses that develop in the host in response to
vaccination (21). Many vaccine efficacy studies examine ILTV replication after challenge,
but some focus only on clinical signs of disease and mortality (21, 22). Furthermore,
studies to meet vaccine registration requirements remain focused mainly on mortality
and clinical signs of disease (23). Expanding standard vaccine characterization studies
to include examination of a vaccine’s capacity to reduce viral replication after subsequent
challenge (as measured by viral titers), and potentially viral recombination,
would help to further control disease caused by this virus. Similar approaches could be
taken for other attenuated live vaccines that are used to control alphaherpesviruses,
such as FeHV-1, BoHV-1, and PRV, in veterinary medicine (24, 25) and for varicella-zoster
virus (VZV) vaccines in human medicine (26), as these viruses all have capacity for
recombination (3).
In this study, a high proportion (67%) of viruses detected following in vivo ILTV
coinoculation were recombinants. This is consistent with findings from an HSV-1 study
that found that 59% of progeny viruses from the cornea and 74% of progeny viruses
from the trigeminal ganglia of mice coinoculated with two strains of HSV-1 were
identified as recombinants using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)
analysis (13). Additionally, in vitro studies have also shown abundant recombination
following alphaherpesvirus coinoculation, although lower proportions of recombinants
are typically detected in cell culture than in in vivo models. For example, approximately
26% of progeny viruses obtained after coinoculation of two HSV-1 strains into cultured
cells were identified as recombinants using RFLP analysis (13), and 13% of the viral
progeny obtained after coinoculation of two VZV strains into cell culture were identified
TABLE 1 Genotypes of viruses detected in high-dose-coinoculated (104 PFU) chickens at 2
and 4 days after coinoculationa
Day 2 Day 4
Genotype
pattern code
Chicken(s) from
which virus
was isolated
No. (%) of
isolates
Genotype
pattern code
Chicken(s) from
which virus
was isolated
No. (%) of
isolates
4 aFor day 2, there were a total of 42 (46.2%) parental viruses and 49 (53.8%) recombinants, for a total of 91
(100%) viruses; for day 4, there were a total of 16 (20.8%) parental viruses and 61 (79.2%) recombinants, for
a total of 77 (100%) viruses.
Loncoman et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 8
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
as recombinants by RFLP analysis (15). Similarly, 10% to 21% of the viral progeny
obtained after coinoculation of an FeHV-1 wild-type strain and two vaccine strains were
identified as recombinants by restriction endonuclease digestion of PCR products
(16). More recently a TaqMan SNP genotyping assay was developed to better detect
TABLE 2 Genotypes of viruses detected in low-dose-coinoculated (103 PFU) chickens at 2
and 4 days after coinoculationa
Day 2 Day 4
Genotype
pattern code
Chicken(s) from
which virus
was isolated
No. (%) of
isolates
Genotype
pattern code
Chicken(s) from
which virus
was isolated
No. (%) of
isolates
1 there were a total of 38 (53.5%) parental viruses and 33 (46.5%) recombinants, for a total of 71
(100%) viruses; for day 4, there were a total of 29 (35.4%) parental viruses and 53 (64.6%) recombinants, for
a total of 82 (100%) viruses.
TABLE 3 Genotypes of viruses detected in low-dose-coinoculated (103 PFU) chickens at 6
and 8 days after coinoculationa
Day 6 Day 8
Genotype
pattern code
Chicken(s) from
which virus
was isolated
No. (%) of
isolates
Genotype
pattern code
Chicken(s) from
which virus
was isolated aFor day 6, there were a total of 15 (34.9%) parental viruses and 28 (65.1%) recombinants, for a total of 43
(100%) viruses; for day 4, there were a total of 31 (57.4%) parental viruses and 23 (42.6%) recombinants, for
a total of 54 (100%) viruses.
ILTV Recombination in the Natural Host Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 9
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
TABLE 4 Recombination breakpoint analysis of full ILTV genome sequences and field isolates from Asia, Australia, and the United States and in vivo recombinants
Origin of isolates
Breakpoint (in alignment), 99% CIa Gene(s) at the beginning of
the breakpoint locationb
Gene(s) at the end of the
breakpoint locationb
Possible viruses involved in
recombination eventc
Method(s) by which breakpoint was
detected in RDP4 Beginning End
Asia (China) 106423–109054 125644–129391 ILTV Recombination in the Natural Host Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 13
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
TABLE 4 (Continued)
Origin of isolates
Breakpoint (in alignment), 99% CIa Gene(s) at the beginning of
the breakpoint locationb
Gene(s) at the end of the
breakpoint locationb
Possible viruses involved in
recombination eventc
Method(s) by which breakpoint was
detected in RDP4 Beginning End
In vivo recombinants 53623–68876 120517–121888 UL35, UL36, UL37, UL38,
UL39
No gene between UL [ 1]
and ICP4
R, sample 23; M, unknown; m,
CSW-1
RDP, GENECONV, Bootscan, MaxChi,
Chimaera, SiScan, 3SEQ
121902–124017 134435–137336 US10, SORF3 US6, US7, US8 R, sample 27; M, V1-99; m,
unknown
RDP, GENECONV, Bootscan, MaxChi,
Chimaera, SiScan, 3SEQ
71911–78480 112397–120377 UL42, UL43, UL44, UL21,
UL20
ICP4 R, sample 15; M, V1-99; m,
CSW-1
RDP, GENECONV, Bootscan, MaxChi,
Chimaera, SiScan, 3SEQ
121904–125713 129197–137424 US10, protein SORF3, US2,
US3
US4, US5, US6, US7, US8 R, sample 15; M, V1-99; m,
sample 23
GENECONV, Bootscan, 3SEQ
74976–97499 111841–114434 UL44, UL21, UL20, UL19,
UL18, UL15, UL17, UL14,
UL13, UL12, UL11, UL10,
UL9
No gene Between UL [-1]
and ICP4
R, sample 12; M, sample 1; m,
V1-99
RDP, GENECONV, Bootscan, MaxChi,
Chimaera, 3SEQ
2256–97499 106970–137424 Entire UL region Entire US region R, sample 12; M, unknown; m,
V1-99
GENECONV, MaxChi, Chimaera
1–32193 105020–137424 UL56, protein IF, UL54, UL53,
UL52, UL51, UL50, UL49.5,
UL49, UL48, UL46, UL45,
protein IA-IB-IC-ID-IE,
UL22
Entire US region R, sample 12; M, unknown; m,
V1-99
GENECONV, MaxChi, Chimaera, 3SEQ
1–1909 5870–17769 No gene UL56, protein IF, UL54,
UL53, UL52, UL51, UL50
R, sample 23; M, sample 1; m,
sample 12
SiScan
1–53621 107559–120122 UL56, protein IF, UL54, UL53,
UL52, UL51, UL50, UL49.5,
UL49, UL48, UL46, UL45,
protein IA-IB-IC-ID-IE,
UL22, UL24, UL25, UL26,
UL26.5, UL27, UL28, UL29,
UL30, UL31, UL32, UL33,
UL34
Entire US region R, V1-99; M, unknown; m,
sample 8
GENECONV, MaxChi, SiScan, 3SEQ
1–137424 1–137424 Entire UL region Entire UL region R, sample 12; M, CSW-1; m,
sample 27
GENECONV, Bootscan, MaxChi, 3SEQ
1–113123 1–113123 Entire UL region Entire UL region R, sample 27; M, V1-99; m,
sample 23
RDP, GENECONV, MaxChi, Chimaera
1–17769 19248–137424 UL56, protein IF, UL54, UL53,
UL52, UL51, UL50
UL48, UL46, UL45, protein
IA-IB-IC-ID-IE, UL22,
UL24, UL25, UL26,
UL26.5, UL27, UL28,
UL29, UL30, UL31,
UL32, UL33, UL34
R, CSW-1; M, sample 15; m,
sample 27
MaxChi, Chimaera, 3SEQ
1–137424 1–137424 Entire UL and US regions Entire UL and US regions R, sample 8; M, sample 15; m,
unknown
GENECONV, MaxChi, 3SEQ
11775–17921 17923–137424 UL53, UL52, UL51, UL50,
UL49.5
UL49, UL48, UL46, UL45,
protein IA-IB-IC-ID-IE,
UL22, UL24, UL25,
UL26, UL26.5, UL27,
UL28, UL29, UL30,
UL31, UL32, UL33, UL34
R, sample 27; M, sample 8; m,
unknown
MaxChi, 3SEQ
1–137424 1–137424 Entire UL and US regions Entire UL and US regions R, sample 15; M, sample 1; m,
unknown
3SEQ
aCI, confidence interval.
bUL, unique long; US, unique short.
cR, recombinant; M, major parent; m, minor parent.
Loncoman et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 14
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/
Downloaded from
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM
.01532-17.
SUPPLEMENTAL FILE 1, PDF file, 2.5 MB.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge Mahathi Nadimpalli, Nino Ficorilli, and Mesula Korsa for
their help with cell culture and Jose Quinteros, June Daly, Jenece Wheeler, and Cheryl
Colson for their help with the in vivo studies.
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (FT140101287). Carlos
A. Loncoman is supported by Becas Chile, CONICYT, Gobierno de Chile.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the
decision to submit the work for publication.
REFERENCES
1. Garcia M, Spatz S, Guy JS. 2013. Laryngotracheitis, p 137–152. In Swayne
D, Glisson J, McDougald L, Nolan L, Suarez D, Nair V (ed), Diseases of
poultry, 13th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
2. Lee SW, Markham PF, Coppo MJ, Legione AR, Markham JF, Noormohammadi
AH, Browning GF, Ficorilli N, Hartley CA, Devlin JM. 2012. Attenuated
vaccines can recombine to form virulent field viruses. Science
337:188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217134.
3. Loncoman CA, Vaz PK, Coppo MJ, Hartley CA, Morera FJ, Browning GF,
Devlin JM. 2017. Natural recombination in alphaherpesviruses: insights
into viral evolution through full genome sequencing and sequence
analysis. Infect Genet Evol 49:174 –185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid
.2016.12.022.
4. Jetzt AE, Yu H, Klarmann GJ, Ron Y, Preston BD, Dougherty JP. 2000. High
rate of recombination throughout the human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 genome. J Virol 74:1234 –1240. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.3
.1234-1240.2000.
5. Holmes EC. 2003. Error thresholds and the constraints to RNA virus
evolution. Trends Microbiol 11:543–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim
.2003.10.006.
6. Mahy BWJ. 2010. The evolution and emergence of RNA viruses. Emerg
Infect Dis 16:899. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1605.100164.
7. Crute JJ, Lehman IR. 1989. Herpes simplex-1 DNA polymerase. Identifi-
cation of an intrinsic 5=–3= exonuclease with ribonuclease H activity. J
Biol Chem 264:19266 –19270.
8. McGeoch DJ, Cook S. 1994. Molecular phylogeny of the alphaherpesvirinae
subfamily and a proposed evolutionary timescale. J Mol Biol 238:
9 –22. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.1264.
9. Drake JW, Hwang CBC. 2005. On the mutation rate of herpes simplex
virus type 1. Genetics 170:969 –970. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104
.040410.
10. Javier RT, Sedarati F, Stevens JG. 1986. Two avirulent herpes simplex
viruses generate lethal recombinants in vivo. Science 234:746 –748.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3022376.
11. Thiry E, Meurens F, Muylkens B, McVoy M, Gogev S, Thiry J, Vanderplasschen
A, Epstein A, Keil G, Schynts F. 2005. Recombination in alphaherpesviruses.
Rev Med Virol 15:89 –103. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.451.
12. Umene K. 1999. Mechanism and application of genetic recombination in
herpesviruses. Rev Med Virol 9:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)
1099-1654(199907/09)9:3 171::AID-RMV243 3.0.CO;2-A.
13. Kintner RL, Allan RW, Brandt CR. 1995. Recombinants are isolated at high
frequency following in vivo mixed ocular infection with two avirulent
herpes simplex virus type 1 strains. Arch Virol 140:231–244. https://doi
.org/10.1007/BF01309859.
14. Muylkens B, Farnir F, Meurens F, Schynts F, Vanderplasschen A, Georges
M, Thiry E. 2009. Coinfection with two closely related alphaherpesviruses
results in a highly diversified recombination mosaic displaying negative
genetic interference. J Virol 83:3127–3137. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI
.02474-08.
15. Dohner DE, Adams SG, Gelb LD. 1988. Recombination in tissue culture
between varicella-zoster virus strains. J Med Virol 24:329 –341. https://
doi.org/10.1002/jmv.1890240310.
16. Fujita K, Maeda K, Yokoyama N, Miyazawa T, Kai C, Mikami T. 1998. In
vitro recombination of feline herpesvirus type 1. Arch Virol 143:25–34.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s007050050265.
17. Henderson LM, Katz JB, Erickson GA, Mayfield JE. 1990. In vivo and in
vitro genetic recombination between conventional and gene-deleted
vaccine strains of pseudorabies virus. Am J Vet Res 51:1656 –1662.
18. Loncoman CA, Hartley CA, Coppo MJC, Vaz PK, Diaz-Méndez A, Browning
GF, Lee S-w, Devlin JM. 2017. Development and application of a
TaqMan single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping assay to study
infectious laryngotracheitis virus recombination in the natural host. PLoS
One 12:e0174590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174590.
19. Davison AJ. 2010. Herpesvirus systematics. Vet Microbiol 143:52– 69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.02.014.
20. Vaz PK, Horsington J, Hartley CA, Browning GF, Ficorilli NP, Studdert MJ,
Gilkerson JR, Devlin JM. 2016. Evidence of widespread natural recombination
among field isolates of equine herpesvirus 4 but not among field
isolates of equine herpesvirus 1. J Gen Virol 97:747–755. https://doi.org/
10.1099/jgv.0.000378.
21. Coppo MJ, Hartley CA, Devlin JM. 2013. Immune responses to infectious
laryngotracheitis virus. Dev Comp Immunol 41:454 – 462. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.dci.2013.03.022.
22. Coppo MJ, Noormohammadi AH, Browning GF, Devlin JM. 2013. Challenges
and recent advancements in infectious laryngotracheitis virus
vaccines. Avian Pathol 42:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457
.2013.800634.
23. Collet S. 2013. Principles of disease prevention, diagnosis and control
introduction, p 4 – 40. In Swayne D, Glisson J, McDougald L, Nolan L,
Suarez D, Nair V (ed), Diseases of poultry, 13th ed. Wiley-Blackwell,
Hoboken, NJ.
24. Luo Y, Li N, Cong X, Wang C-H, Du M, Li L, Zhao B, Yuan J, Liu D-D, Li S,
Li Y, Sun Y, Qiu H-J. 2014. Pathogenicity and genomic characterization of
a pseudorabies virus variant isolated from Bartha-K61-vaccinated swine
population in China. Vet Microbiol 174:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.vetmic.2014.09.003.
25. Jas D, Aeberle C, Lacombe V, Guiot AL, Poulet H. 2009. Onset of immunity
in kittens after vaccination with a non-adjuvanted vaccine against feline
panleucopenia, feline calicivirus and feline herpesvirus. Vet J 182:86 –93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.05.025.
26. Takahashi M, Otsuka T, Okuno Y, Asano Y, Yazaki T, Isomura S. 1974. Live
vaccine used to prevent the spread of varicella in children in hospital.
Lancet 304:1288 –1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90144-5.
27. Kindt R, Coe R. 2005. Tree diversity analysis: a manual and software for
common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World
Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/
resources/databases/tree-diversity-analysis.
28. Tóthmérész B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity
ordering. J Veg Sci 6:283–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236223.
29. Zhao Y, Kong C, Wang Y. 2015. Multiple comparison analysis of two new
genomic sequences of ILTV strains from China with other strains from
different geographic regions. PLoS One 10:e0132747. https://doi.org/10
.1371/journal.pone.0132747.
30. Agnew-Crumpton R, Vaz PK, Devlin JM, O’Rourke D, Blacker-Smith HP,
Konsak-Ilievski B, Hartley CA, Noormohammadi AH. 2016. Spread of the
ILTV Recombination in the Natural Host Applied and Environmental Microbiology
December 2017 Volume 83 Issue 23 e01532-17 aem.asm.org 17
on November 16, 2017 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from
newly emerging infectious laryngotracheitis viruses in Australia. Infect
Genet Evol 43:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.05.023.
31. Dutch RE, Bruckner RC, Mocarski ES, Lehman IR. 1992. Herpes simplex
virus type 1 recombination: role of DNA replication and viral a sequences.
J Virol 66:277–285.
32. Dutch RE, Bianchi V, Lehman IR. 1995. Herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA
replication is specifically required for high-frequency homologous recombination
between repeated sequences. J Virol 69:3084 –3089.
33. Lee K, Kolb AW, Sverchkov Y, Cuellar JA, Craven M, Brandt CR. 2015.
Recombination analysis of herpes simplex virus 1 reveals a bias toward GC
content and the inverted repeat regions. J Virol 89:7214 –7223. https://doi
.org/10.1128/JVI.00880-15.
34. Lee S-W, Devlin JM, Markham JF, Noormohammadi AH, Browning GF,
Ficorilli NP, Hartley CA, Markham PF. 2013. Phylogenetic and molecular
epidemiological studies reveal evidence of multiple past recombination
events between infectious laryngotracheitis viruses. PLoS One 8:e55121.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055121.
35. Kirkpatrick NC, Mahmoudian A, O’Rourke D, Noormohammadi AH. 2006.
Differentiation of infectious laryngotracheitis virus isolates by restriction
fragment length polymorphic analysis of polymerase chain reaction
products amplified from multiple genes. Avian Dis 50:28 –34. https://doi
.org/10.1637/7414-072205R.1.
36. Fahey KJ, Bagust TJ, York JJ. 1983. Laryngotracheitis herpesvirus infection in
the chicken: the role of humoral antibody in immunity to a graded challenge
infection. Avian Pathol 12:505–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458
308436195.
37. Devlin JM, Browning GF, Hartley CA, Kirkpatrick NC, Mahmoudian A,
Noormohammadi AH, Gilkerson JR. 2006. Glycoprotein G is a virulence
factor in infectious laryngotracheitis virus. J Gen Virol 87:2839 –2847.
https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.82194-0.
38. Bagust TJ, Calnek BW, Fahey KJ. 1986. Gallid-1 herpesvirus infection in
the chicken. 3. Reinvestigation of the pathogenesis of infectious laryngotracheitis
in acute and early post-acute respiratory disease. Avian Dis
30:179 –190.
39. Kirkpatrick NC, Mahmoudian A, Colson CA, Devlin JM, Noormohammadi
AH. 2006. Relationship between mortality, clinical signs and tracheal
pathology in infectious laryngotracheitis. Avian Pathol 35:449 – 453.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450601028803.
40. Kawaguchi T, Nomura K, Hirayama Y, Kitagawa T. 1987. Establishment
and characterization of a chicken hepatocellular carcinoma cell line,
LMH. Cancer Res 47:4460 – 4464.
41. Devlin JM, Browning GF, Gilkerson JR. 2006. A glycoprotein I- and glycoprotein
E-deficient mutant of infectious laryngotracheitis virus exhibits
impaired cell-to-cell spread in cultured cells. Arch Virol 151:1281–1289.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-005-0721-8.
42. National Health and Medical Research Council. 2013. Australian code for
the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, 8th ed. National
Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australia.
43. Mahmoudian A, Kirkpatrick NC, Coppo M, Lee SW, Devlin JM, Markham
PF, Browning GF, Noormohammadi AH. 2011. Development of a SYBR
Green quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection
and quantification of infectious laryngotracheitis virus. Avian Pathol
40:237–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2011.553582.
44. Oksanen J. 2015. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R:
vegan tutorial. http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/.
45. Hill MO. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences.
Ecology 54:427–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352.
46. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S,
Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes
P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable
desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence
data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/
bts199.
47. Vaz PK, Job N, Horsington J, Ficorilli N, Studdert MJ, Hartley CA, Gilkerson
JR, Browning GF, Devlin JM. 2016. Low genetic diversity among historical
and contemporary clinical isolates of felid herpesvirus 1. BMC Genomics
17:704. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3050-2.
48. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in
evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254 –267. https://doi.org/10.1093/
molbev/msj030.
49. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B. 2015. RDP4:
detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes.
Virus Evolution 1(1):vev003. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vev003.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario